PurelyFunctional.tv Newsletter 331: Tool: shadow-cljs
From OO to Clojure Workshop!
Watch my free workshop to help you learn Clojure faster and shift your paradigm to functional.
Issue 331 - June 17, 2019 · Archives · Subscribe
Clojure Tool 🔨
I've never used shadow-cljs on a production project, so this week I rolled up my sleeves and used it for a new thing I'm working on. I was quite impressed.
shadow-cljs is a complete project tool, like Leiningen. It does all the hard work you need to do to get a ClojureScript project started, developed, and built. I was very impressed and I daresay it will be my main way to develop ClojureScript projects in the future.
Clojure Media 🍿
I have really been enjoying the ClojureScript Podcast by Jacek Schæ. Just check out the lineup: David Nolen, Russ Olsen, Mike Fikes, and Bradford Smith (who works on Google Closure). Jacek is doing a great job spreading the word about ClojureScript.
Brain skill 😎
Make it concrete.
Programmers have a tendency toward abstraction. It's a good skill, but sometimes we over-apply it. Next time you're stuck on a problem, get down and dirty and make it concrete.
Sure, in the moment, it may seem like you need to write a job scheduling system. But step back and get concrete. What you really need is for one thing to run on Friday at midnight. When you put it that way, a cron job is the obvious answer.
Clojure Challenge 🤔
Last week's challenge
The puzzle in Issue
330 was to list
some properties of the
sort function. They didn't need to be in code.
Even English sentences were accepted. The idea was to start thinking
I got some great submissions. You can check them out [here](https://gist.github.com/eri cnormand/ba94c7f9f48d4c189bca1c7149eea3bc).
Some notable ones:
sortshould be idempotent
sortshould return a collection with the same elements as the argument
sortshould return a collection where each element is less than the next element
All of the submissions were great and rather complete tests for sort. Mark Champine came up with a bunch of interesting ones that test the function from different angles.
There were two techniques that were not used that I thought I should mention.
Generate a sorted list, then shuffle it. Sorting the shuffled list should result in the sorted version.
Sometimes it's easier to generate the desired output than to check the output given random input.
Use another implementation of sort as a model. Compare your version of sort to the model.
In this case, it's probably cheating, but it's the most straightforward way to test it if you can do it. As an example, you could test that a key-value database acts like a hashmap. A hashmap would be your model.
Sometimes, these two techniques can work through difficult situations to test.
This week's challenge
generating sorted lists
In the technique #2 above, we generate a sorted list. But how do we do that?
This week's challenge is to come up with ideas how we might do that. Don't worry if your idea is crazy. The intent is to engage your brain and get thinking about how to generate values.
Here are two I'll just throw out there to plant a seed:
- Generate random lists and throw out unsorted ones. (Clearly, this won't work, but that's okay! I'll throw it out there anyway.)
- Generate random lists and sort them. (Is this cheating? It doesn't matter. I'm putting it out there.)
Now it's your turn. Get creative! Let's see how many wacky ways we can think of.
As usual, please send me your answers. I'll share them all in next week's issue. If you send me one, but you don't want me to share it publicly, please let me know.